I had to write that down before I forgot it.
In my last post I wrote that I am (or was ) (or still am) on the verge of some big ideas. New neuropathways are slowly being etched into the carbon-based mass inside my carbon-based skull. The pathways are being reinforced, each crevice dug a little deeper, with every repetition of the old words as they collide with one another in a new way.
I was watching the History Channel tonight and there was this segment about how the Earth's moon was created. There is some evidence to support the idea that roughly 4 billion years ago there was a "Great Impact". An "asteroid" for lack of a better term was dislodged from it's orbit around the then-molten Earth by the gravitational pull of the planet Jupiter. It flew toward Earth at 25 thousand miles per hour. The asteroid "nicked" one side of the planet and upon impact was shattered into a million pieces, spinning out into space in a long, arm-like shape. Because the asteroid was made up of metals and because gravity already existed in the universe, the scattered pieces began to amass creating Earth's moon in about a year.
A wise man once told me that science and religion lived in different houses and that I was not to imagine that they lived together. He said I could not be a "Dieistic Creationist". (I think he meant I could not choose to believe that God created atoms and thus the atoms have intelligence and thus the universe was created out of divine intelligence). He said that the Greeks referred to the Heavens as the Cosmos which means Order in Greek. The Greeks understood that the world (the WHOLE world - people, animals, plants, tides) all acted in accordance with natural laws. They knew this thousands of years ago.
But it was considered impious to suggest that lighting was "thrown" by anything other than the mighty hand of Zeus. All the knowledge in the world in ancient Greece was rendered useless.
To believe in God is to believe in the irrational. And for "belief in God" to actually be a belief there has to be behavior to accompany it. (Otherwise it's just an idea). (Hence religion??).
I think I am getting closer to the reason why I cannot accept that science and religion live in the same house. I think - I thiiiiiiiiink it may be because if I attribute the natural order of a universe, a solar system, a planet, a moon, and six million known species to the intentional agenda of a divine being, then I am getting the irrational confused with the rational.
That's the danger. Don't call something that is not rational rational and don't call something that is rational not rational. They are separate. Science and religion do not live in the same house. They are both here ('here' meaning part of my experience) but they are not the same.
God it feels good to get that out. I think some of the pathways are secure.